Exposé Structure
At B2, C1 and C2 you must deliver a structured talk from a document before a discussion. A clear plan and signposting matter as well as polished language.
What each level asks
The convocation gives your actual timings. Note how the source differs at each level.
B2
SourceShort prompt text
Your taskExtract the issue, give your view with arguments, then debate
C1
SourceDossier of several documents
Your taskPresent the issue, organise a plan, draw on the documents, then discuss
C2
SourceA recording you hear
Your taskSummarise, build an argued monologue, then debate
Using the preparation time
Keep to this order. The shares are a personal rule of thumb. Write notes, not sentences, apart from your opening and closing lines.
Understand
Share20%
What to doRead or listen carefully. What's the issue? What's the author's view?
Find a question
Share10%
What to doTurn the topic into one problématique
Plan
Share30%
What to doTwo or three parts, with headings and key words
Examples
Share20%
What to doOne concrete example per part, ideally from your own country or experience
Opening and closing
Share15%
What to doWrite your first and last sentences
Run-through
Share5%
What to doSay the plan silently, check your timing
The problématique
This is a question that your talk will answer. It should be open and real, and not yes or no if you can help it. Without one, you only list ideas.
- Dans quelle mesure le numérique transforme-t-il notre rapport au travail ?To what extent is digital technology changing our relationship with work?
- Comment concilier croissance économique et protection de l'environnement ?How can economic growth and environmental protection be reconciled?
- Faut-il craindre l'intelligence artificielle ?Should we fear artificial intelligence?
Introduction script
After greeting the examiners, make five moves. This gives an immediate structure to everything you say next.
| Move | Phrase |
| Hook | De nos jours, ... On entend souvent dire que... |
| Document | Le document que j'ai choisi est un article paru dans... |
| Author's idea | L'auteur y défend l'idée que... Ce texte aborde la question de... |
| Issue | Cela pose la question suivante : ... |
| Plan | Pour y répondre, je verrai d'abord..., puis... et enfin... |
- Le texte que j'ai lu traite du télétravail.The text I read deals with working from home.
- L'auteur y soutient que cette pratique isole les salariés.The author argues there that this practice isolates employees.
- On peut donc se demander si le télétravail est un progrès.So one may ask whether working from home is progress.
Plans that work
Keep it simple: two or three parts is enough. Name your parts out loud.
Dialectical
PartsD'un côté, de l'autre, position personnelle
Works whenClear debate
Problem-solution
PartsConstat, causes, solutions
Works whenSocial issue
Thematic
PartsPlan économique, social, culturel
Works whenBroad topic
Then and now
PartsHier, aujourd'hui, demain
Works whenChange over time
Signposting
Spoken structure has to be audible. Use a signal at every transition.
| Moment | Phrase |
| First part | Tout d'abord, je voudrais aborder... En premier lieu, ... |
| New point | Passons maintenant à... J'en viens à mon deuxième point. |
| Example | Prenons l'exemple de... Dans mon pays, par exemple, ... |
| Referring to source | Comme le souligne l'auteur, ... Le document 2 montre que... |
| Opposing view | Certains diront que... Certes, ... mais... |
| Own view | Pour ma part, je pense que... Personnellement, j'estime que... |
| Summing up a part | En résumé, ... On voit donc que... |
| Going to conclusion | Pour conclure, ... En définitive, ... |
Conclusion and hand-over
Sum up, answer the question, and open out. Then end clearly: examiners should know you have finished.
- Pour conclure, le télétravail n'est ni un progrès absolu ni une menace.To conclude, working from home is neither an absolute advance nor a threat.
- Tout dépend des conditions dans lesquelles il est pratiqué.Everything depends on the conditions in which it's practised.
- Je vous remercie de votre attention.Thank you for your attention.
Delivery
Examiners should feel you are talking to them.
1. Look up. Glance at your notes, then speak to the examiner. 2. Speak from key words only. 3. Slow down at transitions, and pause after each part. 4. Vary your voice and stress key words with c'est... qui. 5. Don't apologise for your French. 6. If you lose your place, restate your plan and go on.
The discussion after
The discussion is a real part of the mark. Expect questions on your examples or objections to your thesis. Respond, develop, nuance, and stay polite. See debate-moves for language.
- C'est un point intéressant, je n'y avais pas pensé.That's an interesting point, I hadn't thought about it.
- Je comprends votre objection, mais je maintiens que...I understand your objection, but I still maintain that...
Common faults
Watch for these.
1. Reading from notes, or reciting a learned text. 2. Summarising the document, then stopping. At B2, the text is a starting point for your opinion. 3. No clear problématique. 4. Listing ideas with no plan. 5. Generalities with no example. 6. Speaking too fast, or running out of time before the conclusion. 7. At C1: treating documents one by one instead of merging them.